Timber
More info
More info
Persbericht Onafhankelijk College van Beroep: 'Hout uit Maleisië is echt niet duurzaam'
Amsterdam, 19 oktober 2011 - Maleisisch hout met het MTCS-keurmerk voldoet niet aan de inkoopcriteria van de Nederlandse overheid voor duurzaam hout. Dat heeft het onafhankelijke College van Beroep van de Stichting Milieukeur vandaag bevestigd. Greenpeace, het Nederlands Centrum voor Inheemse Volken, Milieudefensie, ICCO en het Wereld Natuur Fonds zijn blij met deze uitspraak. Het is ook duidelijke taal aan Staatssecretaris Atsma, die gedurende de beoordelingsprocedure al drie pogingen ondernam om MTCS eigenhandig goed te keuren en daarmee zijn eigen adviesorgaan negeerde.
TPAC file Malaysia
Worldwide many indigenous peoples depend on the forests for their livelihoods. According to the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), half of the indigenous population lives in the tropical rain forest, which is known to harbour 80 per cent of the world's biological diversity. The Netherlands is one of the world's largest importers of tropical timber, importing 700,000 m3 annually in the period 2007-2008.
In the past years, together with other NGOs and parts of the business sector in The Netherlands, NCIV lobbies to make the timber market sustainable. As a result of this, from 2010 on, the Dutch government aims that all its administrative bodies purchase 100% sustainable timber. In order to be able to decide what can be considered to be sustainable timber, the Dutch government developed the Dutch Timber Procurement Criteria. In this process, NCIV successfully advocated the inclusion of safeguards for the rights of indigenous peoples in these criteria. Subsequently, the Timber Procurement Assessment Committee (TPAC) was appointed to judge which timber certification systems are conform with these sustainability criteria.
NCIV now actively monitors the work of TPAC. This led NCIV, in cooperation with Greenpeace and ICCO, to initiate additional research on the way the Malaysian Timber Certification System (MTCS), which had applied to be judged by TPAC, implements the criteria related to the rights of indigenous peoples, together with some of the other criteria. In March 2010 TPAC initially judged that MTCS was conform the Dutch Criteria, but after NCIV together with Greenpeace, ICCO, WWF and Friends of the Earth filed an objection against this judgement TPAC came to a final judgement in October 2010 that MTCS is not conform the Dutch criteria. The Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) then filed an Appeal against TPAC´s final judgement to the Board of Appeal of SMK (Stichting Milieu Keur) in December 2010. On 19 October 2011 this Board of Appeal will deliver its judgement on MTCC´s appeal.
Read more about our programme>>.
Please find the documents related to this issue:
Binding Opinion of Board of Appeal SMK, 19 Oktober 2011
1. SMK Board of Appeal, hearing 5 August 2011
- Documents submitted by MTCC nr. 1: counter response
- Documents submitted by MTCC nr. 2: response to ngo's
- Documents submitted by MTCC nr. 3: response to Joas letter 29-07-2011
- Support letters from social and environmental ngo's
- Documents submitted by ngo's 1 26-07-2011
- Documents submitted by ngo's 2 21-07-2011
- MTCC conversion and indigenous peoples Kelantan 14-07-2011
- MTCC conversion and indigenous peoples Memorandum by ngo's 10-06-2011
- Opening remarks by MTCC 5-08-2011
- Pleadings of lawyer of ngo's 5-08-2011
- Statement by TPAC 5-08-2011
2. Response of TPAC to notice of cross appeal by NGOs
3. Response of TPAC on Notice of Appeal of MTCC
- TPAC response to notice of appeal, 14 January 2011
- Annex I: TPAC user manual, december 2010
- Annex II: Overview procedure MTCC, January 2009 and March 2010
- Annex III: Joas Letter to TPAC
- Annex IV: Forum Report MTCS, 3 March 2010
- Annex V: Response to objection
- Annex VI: MTCS assessment matrix, oktober 2010
- Annex VII: Letter SMK to MTCC, 9 August 2009
- Annex VIII: Letter SMK to MTCC, 21 Oktober 2010
4. Response of NGOs on notice Appeal of MTCC
5. Appeal of MTCC against Final Judgement of TPAC on MTCS
- Appeal against TPAC's final Judgement MTCS, revised October 2010
- Notice of appeal against TPAC assessment, 3 December 2010
- Appendix I, letter MTCC to SMK, 11 August 2009
- Appendix II, SMK to MTCC re: complaint MTCC TPAC assessment , 28 August 2 2009
- Appendix III, NRC article Disagreements over tropical timber, 15 April 2010
- Appendix IV, MTCC to SMK re: complaint MTCC TPAC assessment, 15 October 2010
- Appendix V, SMK to MTCC re: complaint MTCC TPAC assessment, 21 October 2010
6. Letters of State Secretary Atsma to Dutch Parliament
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 17 August 2011
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 23 June 2011
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 12 May 2011
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 9 February 2011
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 7 February 2011
- Letter from State Secretary Atsma to the Dutch Parliament, 29 November 2010
7. Injunction Proceedings District Court The Hague
8. Response to Final TPAC judgement on MTCS
- Letter of SAM to Dutch Parliament: Concerns Regarding the Decision on MTCS by the Dutch government, 30-11-2010
- Letter of JOAS to Dutch Parliament: Concerns Regarding the Decision on MTCS by the Dutch government, 30-11-2010
- Letter of IDEAL to the Dutch Parliament: Concerns Regarding the Decision on MTCS by the Dutch government, 30-11-2010
- Letter from Dutch NGO's to Statesecretary Atsma
9. Final judgement of TPAC on MTCS of 22 October 2010
- Response of TPAC to the Notice of objection which was filed by Greenpeace et. al. against TPAC's final judgement of the MTCS, 22-10-2010
- Assessment matrix TPAC Final Judgement MTCS – revised October 2010
10. Additional documents after hearing of 14 September 2010
- Additional Questions of TPAC to MTCC after Hearing, 16 September 2010
- Response of MTCC to additional questions of TPAC after hearing, 22 September 2010
- Observations of Applicants on MTCC response to additional TPAC Questions after hearing by A.H.J. van den Biesen, attorney at law for petitioners, 6 October 2010
- Comparison by Applicants of MTCC provided audit reports against publicly available information on MTCC website
- Audit report on MTCS for the Kedah State Forest Management Unit by SIRIM QAS International, 30 June 2010
- Audit report on MTCS for the Johor Forestry Department by SGS Group, 1 April 2010
- Audit report on MTCS for the Pahang Forestry Department by SGS Group, 1 February 2010
- Audit report on MTCS for the Negeri Sembilan Forest Management Unit by SIRIM QAS International, 11 January 2010
- Audit report on MTCS for the Segaliud-Lokan Forest Management Unit by SIRIM QAS International, 14 December 2009
11. Documents related to Hearing on the objection of Greenpeace c.s against TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS, 14 September 2010
- Agenda hearing of 14 September 2010
- Questions 14 September 2010
- Applicants opening statement by Phon van den Biesen, attorney at law in Amsterdam representing the applicants
- Applicants statement on Indigenous Peoples by Phon van den Biesen, attorney at law in Amsterdam representing the applicants
- Applicants additional statement on MTCS's performance on indigenous peoples' issues in practice by Andrew Ng
- Applicants statement on conversion by Phon van den Biesen, attorney at law in Amsterdam representing the applicants
- Applicants additional statement on conversion by Wolfgang Richert, Researcher and consultant in Amsterdam, representing the Applicants
- Applicants statement on afternoon session by Phon van den Biesen, attorney at law in Amsterdam representing the applicants
- Applicants written Answer to final TPAC question
- Minutes Hearing 14 september 2010 on the objection of Greenpeace c.s. against TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS
12. Responses by Applicants to questions raised by TPAC
- Response to TPAC's questions by applicants, 30 June 2010
- Annex 2. 'An Unfair Burden, A rapid field assessment on logging impacts of MTCC-certified operations in and around the Orang Asli villages of Pos Jernang and Pos Gedung, Perak', compiled by Andrew Ng and Si-Siew Lim of Grassroots, June 2010
- Annex 2.1. Letter to Mayor of Hamburg by IDEAL (Institute for Development of Alternative Living, Sarawak, Malaysia) to object to acceptance of MTCS, 19 April 2010
- Annex 3. 'Analysis of representation in present Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS) Review Panel', report compiled by Grassroots, NCIV and Wolf Milieuadvies & Conflictbemiddeling, 30 June 2010
- Response to TPAC's questions by applicants, 16 July 2010
13. Questions raised by TPAC to Applicants
- Questions for Applicants in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS, dated 3 March 2010, 10 June 2010
- Questions for Applicants in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS, 16 July 2010
14. Responses by MTCC to questions raised by TPAC
- MTCC's response to TPAC, Questions for MTCC in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's final judgement on MTCS dated 3 March 2010, 30 June 2010
- MTCC's response TPAC, Questions for MTCC in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's final judgement on MTCS dated 16 July , 6 August 2010
15. Questions raised by TPAC to MTCC
- Questions for MTCC in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS, dated 3 March 2010, 10 June 2010
- Questions for MTCC in the objection procedure concerning TPAC's Final Judgement on MTCS, 16 July 2010
16. Formal Response of Dutch government to objection procedure
17. Objection note and related documents
- TPAC Public Assessment Report of MTCS
- Formal objection note to TPAC decision, 16 March 2010
- Supplement to objection note to TPAC decision, 9 April 2010
- Annex 1 of Supplement: Final report: ¨Rubbery Certification; A critical review of the endorsement of the Malaysian Timber Certification System (MTCS) by the Dutch Timber Procurement Assessment Committee (TPAC)', by Aidenvironment Asia, April 2010
- Annex 2 of Supplement: Workshop report: The views and experience of indigenous communities with the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme (MTCS), by Grassroots consultants, April 2010
- Annex 3 of Supplement; Notes to Final judgement of TPAC
- Annex 4 of Supplement; Letter of resignation of WWF Malaysiaas a member of the board of trustees, Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC), January 2002
- Annex 5 of Supplement Letter of concern by WWF Malaysia to certifying organisation of Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC), August 2009
18. Media publications
- Article in Dutch media, Volkskrant, 'Wat is milieuvriendelijk hout', 22 June 2011
- Article in Dutch media, NRC, 'Rechter berispt kabinet wegens overtreden regels toelaten 'fout hout'', 21 June 2011
- Article in Dutch media, Volkskrant, 'Rechter: Kabinet overtreedt regels bij inkoop hout', 21 June 2011
- Article in Dutch media, NRC, "Atsma laat Maleisisch hout toch toe, 30-11-2010"
- Press release NGO's (Dutch): 'Staatssecretaris Atsma accepteert fout hout als duurzaam', 30-11-2010
- Additional press release NGO's (Dutch), 02-12-2010
- Press release 24 October 2010 (Dutch) by WWF, Milieudefensie, ICCO, Greenpeace and NCIV: "MTCS gecertificeerd hout uit Maleisië niet duurzaam Milieu- en ontwikkelingsorganisaties tevreden met uitspraak toetsingscommissie"
- TPAC Press release 22 October 2010 (Dutch) : "TPAC herziet oordeel MTCS"
- TPAC Press release 22 October 2010: (English): "TPAC revises judgement on MTCS"
- Article in Dutch media, NRC Next, "Al dat hout is dat duurzaam?", 16 April 2010
- Article in Dutch media, NRC, "Ruziën over tropisch hardhout uit Maleisië", 15 April 2010
- Press release of WWF, 'Nederlandse inkoopbeleid voor duurzaam hout wordt mislukking met goedkeuring Maleisische standaard MTCS', 14 April 2010
- Press release TPAC, "TPAC concludes: MTCS conform, but decision Minister necessary on risk of forest conversion", 3 March 2010
- Article in Dutch media, Trouw, 'Atsma: Maleisisch hout is wel duurzaam', 8 February 2011
Our news - Timber
- Brief & Notitie aan de 2e Kamer inzake MTCS
- Persbericht Staatssecretaris Atsma accepteert fout hout als duurzaam
- NCIV celebrates judgement that the Malaysian certification system does not meet the Dutch Procurement Criteria for sustainable timber
- Dutch NGOs file objection note on Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme
